« Move over Afghanistan, here comes Florida! | Main | Afghan poppy crop doubles, British troops sit on hands »

The ‘Opium War’ that Wasn’t

Interesting article over at the Harvard Crimson by a professor who is going to be giving a talk on the Opium War on Friday.

One hundred and sixty-six years ago this week, Lord Palmerston, the great British Foreign Secretary, sent a letter to the Imperial Chinese government that paved the way for the 1840-42 Anglo-Chinese conflict, the “Opium War.” It’s a brilliantly snappy name that sneakily prejudges the issue: The world is now convinced that the war was a case of commercial and imperialist British greed trying to force opium on the Chinese.

The world is wrong.

If his talk is a provocative as his premise, it should certainly be an interesting time for anyone interested in the roots of contemporary drug policy and the geopolitics of illicit trade.

Professor Harry Gelber is a Visiting Scholar at the Center for European Studies. He will be giving a talk on the “Opium War” at the Center for European Studies at 2:15 p.m. on Friday, February 24th.

First time here? About Poppies.org

Poppies.org operates under a "harm-reduction" philosophy, providing a nonjudgmental community-based atmosphere for frank and open discussions on such topics as Opium Poppies and Poppy Cultivation, Dried Poppy Pods and Poppy Seeds, Chronic Pain, Use and Abuse, Legal Issues, Addiction, Recovery and Drug Policy Reform.

Make sure to check out the Opium Poppy FAQ, and feel free browse around and read through the Poppy archives, or head on over to the community forums and hang out for a while. Cheers!



Weblog Archives

Poppies.org is licensed under a Creative Commons Canada License.

Privacy Policy :: Terms of Service